Thursday, 4 February 2010

The Hospitable Church

This week we are thinking about the Hospitable Church, and the Bible Readings are:

Luke 19 vs 1 – 5
He entered Jericho and was passing through it. 2 A man was there named Zacchaeus; he was a chief tax collector and was rich. 3 He was trying to see who Jesus was, but on account of the crowd he could not, because he was short in stature. 4 So he ran ahead and climbed a sycamore tree to see him, because he was going to pass that way. 5 When Jesus came to the place, he looked up and said to him, "Zacchaeus, hurry and come down; for I must stay at your house today."

Acts 16 vs 14 – 15
14 A certain woman named Lydia, a worshiper of God, was listening to us; she was from the city of Thyatira and a dealer in purple cloth. The Lord opened her heart to listen eagerly to what was said by Paul. 15 When she and her household were baptized, she urged us, saying, "If you have judged me to be faithful to the Lord, come and stay at my home." And she prevailed upon us.

Revelation 19 vs 6 – 9
REV 19:6 Then I heard what seemed to be the voice of a great multitude, like the sound of many waters and like the sound of mighty thunderpeals, crying out,
"Hallelujah!
For the Lord our God
the Almighty reigns.

REV 19:7 Let us rejoice and exult
and give him the glory,
for the marriage of the Lamb has come,
and his bride has made herself ready;

REV 19:8 to her it has been granted to be clothed
with fine linen, bright and pure"--
for the fine linen is the righteous deeds of the saints.

REV 19:9 And the angel said to me, "Write this: Blessed are those who are invited to the marriage supper of the Lamb." And he said to me, "These are true words of God."

All readings are from the NRSV and copyright © 1989 National Council of Churches, USA

At the risk of more comments regarding definitions, the word hospital, actually comes from the rooms monasteries historically used to offer hospitality to passing travellers. This hospitality was offered not only to pilgrims and patrons of the monastic establishment, but also to the poor and the sick, who would be cared for by the brothers and sisters of the community. Hence why we use the word in the way that we do today.

Since the role of binding up the sick, and caring for the destitute now falls to the medical profession and the state, and is funded from our taxes, this leads me into asking - what is the role of the church in the 21st Century in regards to offering hospitality? Since our historic role of caring been taken over by others, is offering Christian hospitality now solely about making people feel welcome when they come through our doors, and serving good (fair trade) coffee and nice (fair trade) biscuits whilst we chat politely to them after the worship? Well, I think that it is a great deal more than this.

Let me place my cards on the table. I am a firm believer that part of MY role is to be what the Rev’d David Rice calls “a professional non-professional”. It is to do all the different areas of my role professionally, but to recognise that I am not a professional at any of them. This means that I try to value other professionals to whom we should do refer when the circumstances require it, and rely upon them as required. This means that I need to recognise that I am not a Social Worker and so I work in partnership with Social Services, in the same way that I know that I am not a medical professional, and so, as required, I work in partnership with the medical providers. I still consider it a sign that we were getting something right, when I received a phone call from a local GP who asked me to work with him in caring for one of our members who was struggling with issues regarding the death of her friend. This recognition that we both had a part to play and had something to offer was, I felt, was a good thing, and showed that we were professionals working together for the good of those we are called to serve and care for

I think that as a church, we should be thinking in the same way. This means that whilst we offer hospitality, not only in terms of the friendship that hopefully everyone who comes through our door encounters, but also in accommodating other agencies within our walls that we could work in partnership with, to provide a complete solutions to some of life’s problems. This means that rather than being the ones who try to offer everything, instead we are the ones who enable the professionals to do their job, whilst recognising that we have a part to play within that mix. This, I believe, is part of what it means to offer hospitality.

Someone I used to know, used to have a big problem with MAYC that he voiced widely to anyone who would listen; he used to argue that MAYC thought that by giving someone a balloon and singing a bouncy song it made the world’s problems go away. Whilst I may not totally agree with this very cynical attitude, I know what he meant. We are called to be alongside the weak, and the poor, and the vulnerable, and that does not just mean talking about issues, or even collecting money for people, I believe that it is to offer true hospitality, to be a companion on the road, going where we are sent, and journeying with those that God brings to our door. We need to be ready to receive those that he brings, and to be able to offer solutions in a professional manner, recognising that we are the non-professionals that we are.

For examples of the sort of thing that we might feel called to, please have a look at:
• The Healthy Living Centre, Bournville, Weston super Mare - http://www.forallhlc.org/ (this is the estate where I did a year’s placement as a student – before this was built)
• West London Mission caters for inner city needs, much like our own Victoria Hall http://hindestreet.org.uk/Groups/99397/West_London_Mission.aspx
• Bolton’s Victoria Hall which Mark brings his experiences of on Sunday http://www.boltonmethodistmission.co.uk/projects.html
• For an example from across the Atlantic; this is the church that I used to attend in the US http://www.trinityberkeley.org/index.htm

The needs of our community are different to the needs addressed here, but the concept I believe remains valid.

In our groups on Wednesday and Thursday there were five questions to stimulate the discussion, based on the bible readings quoted at the start – these have been re-produced by permission of the publisher:

1. The enjoyment of a meal, of a party, is a constant New Testament theme. How does the experience of coming to visit our community of faith measure up?
2. How might we redesign the entrance to our building to make the experience of encountering our community an easy and happy experience for the newcomer?
3. Do we have the basic facilities e.g. a kitchen and a toilet, to make our hospitality more than a smile and a handshake? If not, what are we going to do about it?
Supplementary question from me: What are “the basic facilities”? Does this mean, the kitchen and the toilet, or does it also include things such as a private and safe counselling area where conversations can be held that cannot be overheard, or a safe place where children can play freely and from where worship is observed?
4. What is the first thing that people see when they enter our worship space? What dominates it visually? What should dominate it, if warm and open hospitality is to be the message?
5. What are the obstacles to putting these things right?

Taken from “Re-pitching the tent – Third Edition, by Richard Giles ©2004 Canterbury Press, an imprint of Hymns Ancient & Modern Ltd. Used by permission.

10 comments:

  1. In some ways we've become more hospitable as a church - at least we now have decent sized Ikea mugs rather than blue cups and we don't serve that strange milky coffee we used to.

    There's a host of problems with our existing building that we all know about, I won't repeat them again.

    It's interesting to think about what we mean by basic facilities - I guess a lot depends on our expectations of home, work and church. In lots of ways, especially to visitors church needs to feel and look 'normal' rather than steping back in time.

    The first thing that people see walking into our Church is the pulpit. It's height makes you feel like you are being talked down to from on high rather than sharing in a conversation or learning together.

    As the weeks go on its so exciting to hear some many ideas - the possibilities are endless.

    ReplyDelete
  2. On hearing that a redundant Church was being heated to be used for storage, I wondered if any thought had been given to to heat it to use for the homeless during the recent cold spell.

    I also wondered if any of the buildings in our Circuit would have been offered. On reflection probably not !!!

    Do we want to be hospitable to those people we know and like, or do we need to be hospitable to the people God would like us to know and like ?

    As for the pulpit I keep looking lovingly at a crowbar I found in the loft !!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have been asked by Ian Slack to post the following comments as feedback from the Thursday housegroup:

    ReplyDelete
  4. 1. The enjoyment of a meal, of a party, is a constant New Testament theme. How does the experience of coming to visit our community of faith measure up?

    • The host(ess)is a key component in our enjoyment of hospitality. At our services, we the Church in this place are collectively and vicariously the host(esse)s as God’s agents and followers.
    • Special considerations need to be given to newcomers to the faith in case they are insecure about established procedures.
    • Formality can be helpful in defining the conventional approach to our liturgical activities but does tend to inhibit people rather than liberate them.
    • New ‘faces’ need gentle, supportive guidance on even such details as where they may sit (for example).
    • When people are chatting in groups, a newcomer can feel excluded and yet may feel threatened if ‘dragged’ into a group.
    • A most positive welcome feeling is when people genuinely convey that they are pleased to see someone.
    • Coming to a ‘special service’ for a first visit can feel even more daunting to a newcomer and one of the most effective ways to reassure people is for an individual to personally greet them. (Happens in Sunday School)

    2. How might we redesign the entrance to our building to make the experience of encountering our community an easy and happy experience for the newcomer?
    a) Early improvements to existing facilities include:
    • use two more people than the existing door stewards to specifically welcome people, especially those unfamiliar with our Church;
    • hand out welcome packs to give useful background and procedural information;
    • create a bright and welcoming entrance area;
    • add further floral (planters) enhancement on approach path;
    • provide name badges for as many members of the congregation as are prepared to wear them. This may make some people feel they know us better.
    b) Design considerations for new premises:
    • spacious, light and airy entrance area, clearly visible from and on a level with the street;
    • a similar feel to that of a well designed shopping ‘mall’ but without any commercial pressures;
    • good quality coffee (and other drinks!) machine in the entrance area;
    • ideally entrance to worship area via one door only;
    • worship area to be clearly visible to secular users of facilities;
    • the Anglican Parish Hall in Ambleside and an unnamed ‘octagonal’ Church in Westhoughton were cited as good examples of modern designs.

    ReplyDelete
  5. 3. Do we have the basic facilities e.g. a kitchen and a toilet, to make our hospitality more than a smile and a handshake? If not, what are we going to do about it? Supplementary question from me (the Rev): what are the “basic facilities”? Does this mean the kitchen and the toilet, or does it include such things as a private and safe counselling area where conversations can be held that cannot be overheard, or a safe place where children can play freely and from where worship is observed?
    • We have the basic facilities exemplified in the book but the toilets leave much to be desired (i.e. ineffective hand driers, poor hot water supply, clutter of stored items, thrown in there out of the way, lack of toilet rolls (in ladies), to name but a few!
    • All agreed that further essential facilities suggested by Ian were serious needs.
    • Additionally, all facilities should provide the best possible access and environment for anyone with special needs.
    • The provision of a practical IT facility at a realistic but useful level would help youngsters with no home internet access to appreciate our facility.
    • An up to date, alive and informative notice board should set the tone on approach.

    4. What is the first thing that people see when they enter our worship space? What dominates it visually? What should dominate it if warm and open hospitality is to be the message?
    • Many peoples’ first impression on entering the chapel (Longsight) is lots of wood (especially pews – fixed in serried ranks) and the consequent view of the backs of assembled heads!
    • By contrast, the chapel at Tott Rd was seen to be more open, conducive to free movement and less oppressive at the front.
    • For the new build, flexible seating allowing a C-format, when required, would be preferred.
    • The organ and pulpit dominate the front of LS chapel, overshadowing the Communion table. This effect is less at Tott Rd
    • The banners are one of the most positive features of LS chapel, providing much visual appeal, a feature changing weekly with poignant, thought provoking messages and beautifully designed and produced. A clear white background would enhance their effect.
    • A photo poster of all in a Leadership role at Harwood Methodist would be beneficial at the earliest opportunity.
    • The new liturgical space should include:
    o Beautiful, symbolic items such as banners, stained glass windows, appropriate relics from current chapels and well designed posters/leaflets;
    o facilities for deploying modern technologies in the most unobtrusive way (i.e. data projector and well sited screens, top PA facility, music, sophisticated keyboard and reliable radio mics.
    • Above all, the worship area should enhance the sacredness and holiness of our act of worship and convey that to outside observers.
    • The Communion table should be accessible by the serving Minister from all sides and all ends.

    ReplyDelete
  6. 5. What are the obstacles to putting these things right?
    • This was dealt with in terms of what may be done in the short term to alleviate some of the above shortcomings. The one drastic action, which appealed to a number of the people in the group was to remove the pulpit! A suggestion of removing the organ was not quite as popular!
    • A recognised obstacle was individual objections based on personal preference or historic/sentimental attachments to certain features.
    • Consideration needs to be given to war memorials and personal memorials and one example was cited of a Tyldesley church where valued relics of the old chapel were built into the foundation of the new one.
    Summary of how we’re doing, hospitality-wise:
    • Some find it easier to open conversation with initial ‘strangers’. It, therefore, behoves those with less inhibitions and a talent for putting people at ease, to further increase their contribution on this aspect.
    • There needs to be a good balance between regulation at one extreme and unruliness at the other. Formal guidelines can be helpful in enhancing clarity as long as they do not inhibit spiritual freedom and expressions of spirituality.
    • There needs to be good balance between the mystical/spiritual and the practical aspects of liturgy.
    • Supportive links with the community are part of our ‘raisin d’être’.

    ReplyDelete
  7. For those that missed Sunday afternoon Mark Street used the attached short sketch on Missional Church

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=arxfLK_sd68

    following a link I watched Michael Frost on being a Missional Church

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77ndCFSv47g&NR=1

    please don’t be put off by the runtime ( I nearly was ) it really challenges Church as we are at present and to seek Which Way.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Mug or jug? Are we keepers or sharers? How much of Jesus's time was spent in the temple? Most of his reported work was done out in the community. If we love with Jesus's heart, we will want to be out amongst his people sharing and loving. However, no matter what work we do in the community, no matter how many people are led to Christ as a result, if coming to our Church is a bad experience, they won't return.
    A few years ago, a work colleague told me that her mum had said to her 'I wish you'd start going to that Church with your mate from work'. Wow, I should have grabbed that opportunity but, I have to be honest, that whilst I didn't actively put her off coming, I did nothing to encourage her. I love our Church but the prospect of bringing a friend to the 'average service' when I wouldn't even be able to be in there with her was something I didn't feel i could do. I wasn't worried about the people side of things but I was bothered about the fact that we don't really seem to have moved on for years in terms of what we offer.
    Perhaps next time we're in church, we should ask ourselves the question 'is this what God had in mind?'
    In terms of what we should build/what changes we should make to best enable hospitality, well I think most have already been covered in other blogs. BUT I do think that we can build the best building in the land but if what we offer as a church (the people, building, worship, etc.) isn't up to much, well Morrisons cafe is only down the road and they offer better big breakfasts than we'll be able to with a level of hospitality that most people are content with. We've got to be about more than a decent building, more than a nice welcome, more than a lively worship style, we've got to be the whole package and that is a real challenge!

    ReplyDelete
  9. I don't know if it is just me but I find that all of the questions (with the exception of Ian's addition), could be described as rhetorical or almost sarcastic. They do a good job of making us look at our facilities and we should bow our heads in shame. I agree that our hospitality has improved but I think that the majority of that is not in the 'chapels' but actually in the halls. In both chapel buildings the first image is a claustrophobic entrance giving no view of what is inside. The worship is better (without a doubt), our presence is increasing and there is a drive to move onwards in our faith activities and outwards in our mission. So do we need a chapel - probably not, a worship space - definately, a place for councellors - yes, a kitchen - yes, a breakfast better than Morrisons - easy. Here's a thought - you have to pay at Morrisons for someone to smile at you and then get your order wrong that is not hospitality, hospitality should come without charge. You also have to be able to afford the food at Morrisons. Whilst the people there are our mission field, so are those who cannot afford the cafe but are shopping for all the cheap food. So are the people who don't have the money even to walk into Morrisons. We should be giving them a place to go, food to eat "No there's no charge for that, how else can we help, tell me your story", and access to support systems. The worship - "Thank you God that YOU have given US the facilities to show YOUR love in all its fulness to your creation".

    ReplyDelete
  10. The little video clip is really interesting. Thanks for this David - it's downloaded and saved, I suspect it will get an outing in a service sooner or later.
    Maybe a Church has to progress and develop through the first two stages before it can develop into being a missional church. Whilst we might be aspiring to be a missional church there is value in being the centre of the community and in organising evangelist events. Lets not count this out as part of our mission.

    ReplyDelete